SOCIAL AND LEGAL PROVISIONS RELATED TO LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIP IN INDIA: AN EVALUATION

Main Article Content

SHYAM PRAKASH PANDEY

Abstract

Live-in-relationship is not new for western countries but these days the concept is adjusting its roots in the east also. Live in relationship is an emerging concept of relationship in India.  Live in relationship has become popular among youths but certain sections of the society discourage such practices and term it as immoral and unethical. Indian Judiciary has divergent view regarding the institution of Live in relationship. In India, Law related to Live-in relationship is not uniform. The need of the hour is that legislature must enact certain law for regulation of such relationship. This article is an attempt to discuss social status as well as legal provisions with respect to Live-in relationship in India.

Keywords:
Cohabitation, marriage, live-in-relationship

Article Details

How to Cite
PANDEY, S. P. (2021). SOCIAL AND LEGAL PROVISIONS RELATED TO LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIP IN INDIA: AN EVALUATION. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 7(4), 44-50. Retrieved from http://mbimph.com/index.php/AJOAIR/article/view/2167
Section
Opinion Article

References

Available:https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Live-in+relationship

Available:http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/211/Live-in-Relationships.html

Fyzee AA: Outlines of Mohammadan law, 5th edition; 2009.

Mishra, US and Hasnain, Nadeem: Introducing Social and Cultural Anthropology, Jawahar Publication; 2017.

Taylor vs. Fields. 1986;224 Cal. Rpr. 186

1927 SCC OnLine PC 51 : AIR 1927 PC 185

1929 SCC OnLine PC 21 : AIR 1929 PC 135

2001 SCC OnLine All 332

(2006) 8 SCC 726

(2010) 9 SCC 209

Khushboo S, vs. Kanniammal & Anr. 2010;(4) SCALE 462

2010 SCC OnLine Del 2645

(2011) 1 SCC 141

(2011) 1 SCC 38, para 38.

Velusamy D, v. Patchaiammal D. 2010;10 SCC 469 : AIR 2011 SC 479

(2013) 15 SCC 755

Abhijit Bhikaseth Auti v. State Of Maharashtra and Others

Payal Katara v. Superintendent Nari Niketan Kandri Vihar Agra and Others

Velusamy D, v. Patchaiammal D, [AIR 2011 SC 479].

Madhu Bala v. State of Uttarakhand, 2020 scc Online Utt. 276, decided on 12-06-2020

(1994) 1 SCC 460 : AIR 1994 SC 133.

(2008) 4 SCC 520 : AIR 2008 SC 1193

Madan Mohan Singh v. Rajni Kant, (2010) 9 SCC 209 : AIR 2010 SC 2933

Bharatha Matha & Anr. v. R.Vijaya Renganathan & Ors. 2010 STPL(Web) 406 SC

(2011) 11 SCC 1 : (2011) 2 UJ 1342.

Bharatha Matha & Anr. v. R.Vijaya Renganathan & Ors. 2010 STPL(Web) 406 SC.

Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and Anr AIR 2006 SC 2522.