Main Article Content
The high rate of Urbanization and the consequent loss of bird habitat at the global level is increasing day by day. Due to this activity challenging ecosystem will create problems in the future because more people prefer to live in the cities. The main objective of the study was to know the current status of urban bird diversity, habitat and conservation plan. Point count and Line transect methods were used for the bird survey. The various bird species were sighted through binocular and species identification was done by using different identification keys. Photograph of birds was taken by the Nikon DSLR camera and GPS locations of each study site were recorded in the datasheet. The total numbers of 90 bird species were recorded from all study sites belonging to 16 orders and 43 families. In recent times some species migrated from urban to semi-urban areas because they have not existed in narrow habitat. However, some scavengers bird seen at dead animal dumping sites. Family Columbidae was found dominant with a 6% contribution followed by families like Muscicapidae, Sturnidae, Motacillidae, Scolopacidae and Anatidae with 5% contribution each and further followed by other families with less than 5% contribution. These present results indicate that Rock dove is highly habituated in the urban ecosystem while House sparrow, Golden oriole, Grey hornbill and Egyptian vulture are sensitive species. So they are seen as local migratory species. The conservation plan is needed to develop green belts at street level and with the maintenance of the old gardens; new parks should be established in urban areas. The artificial nest (wooden nest), food (mixed grains) and water properly take place in parks. Birds are also important for the maintenance of the ecosystem because they act as an effective tool for biological pest control.
Marzluff JM. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In Marzluff JM, et al. (ed.) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston, MA. 2001;19-38.
Chace JF, Walsh JJ. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape Urban Plan. 2006;74:46-69.
Kumar A, Walker S, Molur S. Prioritisation of endangered species. Setting Biodiversity Conservation Priorities for India. New Delhi, WWF-India. 2000;2:341-425.
Savard JPL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2000;48:131-142.
Harney NV, Bhute KB. Diversity of avifauna in and around Chalbardi (Rai) lake near Bhadrawati, district Chandrapur (M.S.), India. Journal of Global Biosciences. 2014;3(2):399-405.
Nilon CH, Long CN, Zipperer WC. Effects of wildland development on forest bird communities. Landsc. Urban Plann. 1994;32:81-92.
Friesen LE, Eagles PFJ, Mackay RJ. Effects of residential development on forest-dwelling neotropical migrant songbirds. Conserv. Biol. 1995;9:1408-1414.
Ali S. The book of Indian birds. Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press. 2002;326.
Grewal B, Harvey V, Pfister O. A photographic guide of the Birds of India. Periplus Edition (H K) Ltd. Singapore; 2002.
Khan JA, Khan DN, Ahmed A. Preliminary investigations of bird community structure at Aligarh, India. Tropical Ecology. 2008;34:217-225.
Furness RW, Greenwood JJD. Birds as a monitor of environmental change. Chapman and Hall, London; 1993.
Schwartz CW, Schwartz ER. An ecological reconnaissance of the pheasants of Hawaii. Auk. 1951;68: 281–314.
Padoa–Schioppa E, Baietto M, Massa R, Bottoni L. Bird communities as bioindicators: The focal species concept in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Indicators. 2006;6(1): 83–93.
Islam MZ, Rahmani AR. Important bird area in India: Priority sites for conservation. IBCN, Bombay Natural History Society, BirdLife International, UK. 2004;28:1133.
Mallick JK. Past and present status of the In-dian Tiger in northern West Bengal, India: An overview. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2010; 2(3):739–952.
Karmakar M. Ecotourism and its impact on the regional economy – A study of North Bengal (India). Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism. 2011; 6(1):251–270.