Main Article Content



Aim: Habitat abundance relationships suggest that House crows are highly dependent on anthropogenic food sources. Thus urban locality is a prime preference as habitat by House crow. It is now well established that house crow is an invasive species and may be threat to local bird fauna. Over population may lead to unhygienic condition and economic damages. On the other hand there are Reports from some part of India where it is claimed that house crows are less in number to meet their cultural/religious demand. It is necessary for us to know how this bird utilizes feeding resources around us that is important for proper population management of this invasive bird species. Present study was conducted in urban locality of city Prayagraj, having plenty of feeding opportunities for House crows to know feeding strategies adopted by House crow.

Methodology: Focal animal sampling method has been adapted to record feeding behavior of House crow. Total 41 feeding sites were visited to calculate number of House crows by following total count method with the use of available instruments. Two types of feeding sites have been identified namely regular feeding site and irregular feeding site. Apart from this, six land use categories i.e. residential area, public park/roadside, meat shop/ fish market, commercial area, municipal dumping site and cultural/religious place were observed to work out feeding resource utilization strategies adopted by House crow. Appropriate statistical tests have been applied in this regard.

Results: Significant difference has been found between total number of regular and irregular feeding sites (Calculated χ2 4.60 < critical χ2 3.84 p= .031). There was no significant difference in number of feeding sites among land use categories (Calculated χ2 4.72 < critical χ2 11.07 p= .448). Likewise no significant difference have been found in number of regular (Calculated χ2 2.72 < critical χ2 5.99 p= .256) and irregular (Calculated χ2 6.79< critical χ2 9.48 p= .147) feeding sites among land use categories. Significantly more House crow feed on regular feeding sites in comparison to irregular feeding sites (calculated t-value 7.084 >critical t-value 2.022 p < .0001).Significant difference has been found among number of house crow feeding under different land use categories(calculated F-value 4.828 > critical F- value 2.485 p .0018). No significant correlation has been observed among number of feeding sites in each land use categories and number of house crow feeing on them ( calculated r- value 0.069 < critical r- value 0.811 p .895). Significant correlation has been observed between amount of food available in different land use categories and number of House crows feeding on them(calculated r-value 0.995> critical r- value 0.811 p .002). No positive correlation has been observed between number of feeding sites and amount of food available in each land use category (calculated r- value 0.152 < critical r-value 0.811 p .773).

Conclusion: It was concluded that in present circumstances House crows mostly relay on dumping and cultural religious places for feeding purpose and hence for survival. Present work will help in proper population management of this environmental/cultural important bird.

House crow (Corvus splendens), house crow population, Prayagraj (Allahabad), types of food, urban resource utilization

Article Details

How to Cite
KUMAR, P., & OJHA, A. K. (2021). FEEDING RESOURCE UTILIZATION STRATEGIES OF (Corvus splendens) IN URBAN HABITAT OF PRAYAGRAJ (U.P.), INDIA. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 42(23), 55-61. Retrieved from http://mbimph.com/index.php/UPJOZ/article/view/2607
Original Research Article


Mohammadabadi MR, Nikbakhti M, Mirzaee HR, et al. Genetic variability in three native Iranian chicken populations of the Khorasan province based on microsatellite markers. Russ J Genet. 2010;46:505-509.

Moazeni S, Mohammadabadi MR, Sadeghi M, et al. Association between UCP gene polymorphisms and growth, brreeding value of growth and reproductive traits in mazandaran indigenous chicken. Open J. Anim. Sci. 2016a;6:1-8.

Mohammadifar A, Faghih Imani SA, Mohammadabadi MR, Soflaei MM. The effect of TGFb3 gene on phenotypic and breeding values of body weight traits in Fars native fowls. Agric. Biotech. J. 2014;5:125-136.

Moazeni SM, Mohammadabadi MR, Sadeghi M, et al. Association of the melanocortin-3(MC3R) receptor gene with growth and reproductive traits in Mazandaran indigenous chicken. J. Livest. Sci. Techno. 2016b;l4:51-56.

Shahdadnejad N, Mohammadabadi MR, Shamsadini MM. Typing of clostridium perfringens isolated from broiler chickens using multiplex PCR. Genetics in the third millennium. 2016;14 (4):4368-4374.

Mohammadifar A, MR, Mohammadabadi MR. the effect of uncoupling protein polymorphisms on growth, breeding value of growth and reproductive traits in the fars indigenous chicken. Iran J ApplAnimSci. 2017;7:679-685.

Mohammadifar A, Mohammadabadi MR. Melanocortin-3 receptor (mc3r) gene association with growth and egg production traits in Fars indigenous chicken. Malays ApplBiol. 2018;47:85–90.

Zandi E, Mohammadabadi MR, Ezzatkhah M, Esmailizadeh AK. typing of toxigenic isolates of clostridium perfringens by multiplex PCR in Ostrich. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science (IJAS). 2014;4 (4):509-514.

Robertson D. Bird families of the world: Corvidae; 2000. Available:http://www.montereybay.com/creagrus/corvids.html

Invasive animal risk assessment, Indian house crow (Corvussplendens): Department of Agriculture and Fisheriesbio security Queensland, Queensland government; 2016.

Chahal BS, Simwat GS, Brar HS. Bird pests of crops and their control. Pesticides. 1973;7(5):18-20.

Kumar P. Reproductive behavior and parental care in little brown dove, Streptopelia senegalenssis during COVID-19lockdown period in Prayagraj (Allahabad) UP, India. World Journal of Zoology. 2020;15(3): 14-23.

Saiyad SK, Soniand VCB, Radaria B. Urban resource utilization for feeding purpose by House crow (Corvussplendens). International journal of recent scientific research. 2015;6(12):7933-7935.

Nyari A, Ryall C, Peterson TA. Global invasive potential of the house crow Corvussplendens based on ecological niche modeling. Avian biol. 2006;37(4):306-311.

Lim HC, Sodhi NS, Brook BW, Soh MS. Undesirable aliens: Factors determining the distribution of three invasive bird species in Singapore. Journal of tropical ecology. 2003;19:685-695.

Alam I, Alam MDN. Feeding habits of house crow, Corvusspendensin the urban ecosystem of Kolkata. Proc. Zool. Soc. India. 2018;17(2):57-62.

Sen S. In praise of crows; 2011. Available:http://birdsofindia-ssen.blogspot.in/2011/08/inpraise

Nxele BJ, Shivambu CT. House crow (Corvus splendens) eradication measures from eThekwini municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of biodiversity management & forestry. 2018;7(2):1-5.

Koul S, Sahi DN. Feeding ecology of house crow (Corvussplendens) in open agricultural fields in Jammu (J&K), India. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences. 2013;2(06):85-87.

Altmann J. Observational study of behavior – sampling method. 1974;227-267.

Khan HA, Jabeen G, Anwar N. Foraging rhythms of house crow ( Corvussplendens) for 30 and 60- minute durations on some crops in an agro-ecosystem in Faisalabad.Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2007;44(02):283-288.

Marzluff JM, Neatherlin E. Corvid response to human settlements and campgrounds: Causes, concequences and challenges for conservation. Biological conservation. 2006;130:301-314.