COMPLEX PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES TREATED WITH PLATING AND CONSERVATIVE MEANS

Main Article Content

SANDIP PATIL
S. G. TAKALE
V. S. MANE
PRASHANT D. I. PANDEY
AANSHUL PANCHOLIYA

Abstract

The most of proximal humerus fractures are minimally displaced, low-energy osteoporotic fractures and are successfully treated with conservative care. However, for those with mild to extreme displacement, appropriate care for the patient has not been completely explained. A prospective, comparative study was conducted with 50 patients to compare and evaluate functional outcome of complex proximal humerus fractures treated with plating and conservative method in elderly. The patients were selected randomly and were divided in the following two groups of 25 patients each: Group A: Cases of complex proximal humerus fractures treated conservatively; Group B: Cases of complex proximal humerus fractures treated with plating. Locking plate is the recommended implant for comminuted proximal humerus fractures. In this study, the effects of locked plate fixation were close to those of non-operative care. Early physiotherapy and a proper rehabilitation program are key to a stable working result.

Keywords:
Proximal humerus fractures, plating, trauma.

Article Details

How to Cite
PATIL, S., TAKALE, S. G., MANE, V. S., PANDEY, P. D. I., & PANCHOLIYA, A. (2021). COMPLEX PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES TREATED WITH PLATING AND CONSERVATIVE MEANS. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 42(2), 13-17. Retrieved from https://mbimph.com/index.php/UPJOZ/article/view/1902
Section
Original Research Article

References

Horak J, Nilsson BE. Epidemiology of fracture of the upper end of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;112:250–3.

Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(5):285–7.

Crispin Ong, Christopher Bechtel. Three- and four-part fractures have poorer function than one-part proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3292–3299.

Barrett JA, Baron JA, Karagas MR, Beach ML. Fracture risk in the U.S. Medicare population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:243–249.

Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J, Erin-Madsen J, Grum B, Horsnaes MW, Aalberg JR: Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58:75-7.

Jones G, Nguyen T, Sambrook P, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA: Progressive loss of bone in the femoral neck in elderly people: longitudinal findings from the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. BMJ. 1994;309:691-5.

Fu T, Xia C, Li Z, Wu H. Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2014;7(12):4607-4615.

Bagul RR, Joshi U, Kakatkar V, Deo S. Comparative Study of Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly by Conservative Method Versus Operative Locking Compression Plate. J Pharm Biomed Sci. 2015;05(11):831–838.

Rodiaa F, Theodorakisb E, Touloupakisb G, Ventura A. Fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with a locking plate: A retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcome and complications Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2016;19(3):156-159.

Tadvi ND, Deveshawar RN, Patel YC. Treatment of proximal humerus fracture using proximal humerus locking plating. Int J Res Orthop. 2017;3:670-5.

Patil SN, Srinivas P, Bhadbade V. A prospective study of 30 cases of PHILOS plating for displaced proximal humeral fractures. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences IJOS. 2017;3(3):86-91.