Impact of Plant on Insect Behavior and Sex Pheromone Emission

Burjikindi Madhuri *

Department of Entomology, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500030, Telangana, India.

Kolli Bharghavi

Department of Entomology, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500030, Telangana, India.

Vinutha R K

Department of Entomology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, 580005, India.

Neeli Priyanka

Department of Entomology, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500030, Telangana, India.

Srija P

Department of Entomology, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500030, Telangana, India.

Supraja K V L

Department of Entomology, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, 500030, Telangana, India.

Methuku Anil Kumar

Plant Biosecurity Division, National Institute of Plant Health Management, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030, Telangana, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Insects intricately interact with host plants, significantly impacting their behavior and chemical communication, especially in phytophagous species. Insect physiology and behavior, particularly sex pheromone communication, are influenced by host plants, which improves mating and reproduction. While some insects release sex pheromones in response to cues from plants, others use the molecules of their host plants to synthesize sex pheromone precursors. Host plants chemicals synergize with sex pheromones, aiding in insect communication and reproductive success. These interactions shape various aspects of insect behavior, from aggregation formation to mate and host finding strategies, and even reproductive isolation among related species. Understanding these relationships is essential for comprehending ecological dynamics and devising sustainable pest management strategies.

Keywords: Behavior, flower, fruit, gustatory cues, herbivores, host plant, leaf volatiles, olfactory cues, parasitoids, pheromones, plant volatiles, synergism


How to Cite

Madhuri, B., Bharghavi, K., Vinutha R K, Priyanka, N., Srija P, Supraja K V L, & Kumar, M. A. (2024). Impact of Plant on Insect Behavior and Sex Pheromone Emission. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 45(12), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2024/v45i124103

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachmann GE, Belliard SA, Devescovi F, Nussenbaum AL, Fernández PC, Vera MT, Ruiz MJ, Segura DF. Effect of fruit volatiles from native host plants on the sexual performance of Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 males. Insects. 2023;14 (2):188.

Landolt PJ, Phillips TW. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annual review of entomology. 1997;42(1):371-91.

Siddhartha K, Chinniah C, Shanthi M. Impact of host plant on the pheromonal response of phytophagous insects. Journal of Entomology and Zoology. 2020; 8(3):1888-1892.

Xu H, Turlings TC. Plant volatiles as mate-finding cues for insects. Trends in Plant Science. 2018;23(2):100-111.

Menacer K, Hervé MR, Cortesero AM, Aujames T, Anton S. Sex-and maturity-dependent antennal detection of host plant volatiles in the cabbage root fly, Delia radicum. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2023;146:104500.

Devescovi F, Hurtado J, Taylor PW. Mating-induced changes in responses of female Queensland fruit fly to male pheromones and fruit: A mechanism for mating-induced sexual inhibition. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2021;129:104195.

Brévault T, Quilici S. Flower and fruit volatiles assist host‐plant location in the Tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens. Physiological Entomology. 2010;35(1):9-18.

Saveer AM, Kromann SH, Birgersson G, Bengtsson M, Lindblom T, Balkenius A, Hansson BS, Witzgall P, Becher PG, Ignell R. Floral to green: mating switches moth olfactory coding and preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;279(1737): 2314-22.

Shorey HH. Environmental and physiological control of insect sex pheromone behavior. In Pheromones, ed. MC Birch, New York: North Holland. 1974;62–80.

Jaffé K, Sánchez P, Cerda H, Hernández JV, Jaffé R, Urdaneta N, Guerra G, Martínez R, Miras B. Chemical ecology of the palm weevil Rhynchophorus palmarum (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): attraction to host plants and to a male-produced aggregation pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1993;19:1703-20.

Lextrait P, Biémont JC, Pouzat J. Pheromone release by the two forms of Callosobruchus maculatus females: effects of age, temperature and host plant. Physiological entomology. 1995;20(4):309-17.

Benelli G, Daane KM, Canale A, Niu CY, Messing RH, Vargas RI. Sexual communication and related behaviours in Tephritidae: current knowledge and potential applications for Integrated Pest Management. Journal of Pest Science. 2014;87:385-405.

Bachmann GE, Segura DF, Devescovi F, Juárez ML, Ruiz MJ, Vera MT, Cladera JL, Teal PE, Fernández PC. Male sexual behavior and pheromone emission is enhanced by exposure to guava fruit volatiles in Anastrepha fraterculus. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):0124250.

Raina AK, Kingan TG, Mattoo AK. Chemical signals from host plant and sexual behavior in a moth. Science. 1992;255(5044):592-4.

Rochat D, Meillour PN, Esteban-Duran JR, Malosse C, Perthuis B, Morin JP, Descoins C. Identification of pheromone synergists in American palm weevil, Rhynchophorus palmarum, and attraction of related Dynamis borassi. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2000;26:155-87.

Nakamuta K, Leal WS, Nakashima T, Tokoro M, Ono M, Nakanishi M. Increase of trap catches by a combination of male sex pheromones and floral attractant in longhorn beetle, Anaglyptus subfasciatus. Journal of chemical ecology. 1997;23(6):1635-40.

Fang Y, Zeng R, Lu S, Dai L, Wan X. The synergistic attractiveness effect of plant volatiles to sex pheromones in a moth. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2018; 21(1):380-7.

Saïd I, Kaabi B, Rochat D. Evaluation and modeling of synergy to pheromone and plant kairomone in American palm weevil. Chemistry Central Journal. 2011;5:1-1.

Dickens JC, Smith JW, Light DM. Green leaf volatiles enhance sex attractant pheromone of the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (Lep.: Noctuidae). Chemoecology. 1993;4:175-7.

Yang Z, Bengtsson M, Witzgall P. Host plant volatiles synergize response to sex pheromone in codling moth, Cydia pomonella. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2004;30:619-29.

Sans A, Moran M, Riba M, Guerrero A, Roig J, Gemeno C. Plant volatiles challenge inhibition by structural analogs of the sex pheromone in Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). European Journal of Entomology. 2016;113:579.

Ochieng S, Park K, Baker T. Host plant volatiles synergize responses of sex pheromone-specific olfactory receptor neurons in male Helicoverpa zea. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2002; 188:325-33.

Carde R, Willis M. Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2008;34: 854–66.

Sugiura N. Mate-seeking and oviposition behavior of Chyliza vittata (Diptera: Psilidae) infesting the leafless orchid Gastrodia elata. Entomological Science. 2016;19:129–32.

Conner W, Best BA. Biomechanics of the release of sex pheromone in moths: effects of body posture on local airflow. Physiological Entomology. 1988;13(1):15–20.

Du HT, Li Y, Zhu J, Liu F. Host-plant volatiles enhance the attraction of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to sex pheromone. Chemoecology. 2022;32(3):129-38.

Erdei A, Preti M, Bengtsson M, Witzgall P. Host plant odour and sex pheromone are integral to mate finding in codling moth. bioRxiv. 2023:2023-10.

Lyu F, Hai X, Wang Z. A review of the host plant location and recognition mechanisms of Asian longhorn beetle. Insects. 2023; 14(3):292.

Kromann SH, Saveer AM, Binyameen M, Bengtsson M, Birgersson G, Hansson BS, Schlyter F, Witzgall P, Ignell R, Becher PG. Concurrent modulation of neuronal and behavioural olfactory responses to sex and host plant cues in a male moth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015;282(1799): 20141884.

Xu H, Desurmont G, Degen T, Zhou G, Laplanche D, Henryk L, Turlings TC. Combined use of herbivore‐induced plant volatiles and sex pheromones for mate location in braconid parasitoids. Plant, cell & environment. 2017;40(3):330-9.

Dicke M, Van Loon JJ, Soler R. Chemical complexity of volatiles from plants induced by multiple attack. Nature chemical biology. 2009;5(5):317-24.

de Rijk M, Dicke M, Poelman EH. Foraging behaviour by parasitoids in multiherbivore communities. Animal Behaviour. 2013;85(6):1517-28.

Sivinski JM, Epsky N, Heath RR. Pheromone deposition on leaf territories by male Caribbean fruit flies, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew)(Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Insect Behavior. 1994;7:43-51.

Kapranas A, Giudice DL, Peri E, Millar JG, Colazza S. Emergence, dispersal, and mate finding via a substrate‐borne sex pheromone in the parasitoid Metaphycus luteolus. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata. 2013;148(1):74-83.

Noldus LP, Potting RP, Barendregt HE. Moth sex pheromone adsorption to leaf surface: bridge in time for chemical spies. Physiological Entomology. 1991;16(3): 329-44.

Baldwin IT. Plant volatiles. Current Biology. 2010;20(9):R392-7.

Niinemets Ü, Loreto F, Reichstein M. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends in plant science. 2004;9(4):180-6.

Kolosova N, Gorenstein N, Kish CM, Dudareva N. Regulation of circadian methyl benzoate emission in diurnally and nocturnally emitting plants. The Plant Cell. 2001;13(10):2333-47.

Bruce TJ, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends in plant science. 2005;10(6):269-74.

Dickens JC. Green leaf volatiles enhance aggregation pheromone of boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata. 1989;52(3): 191-203.

Reddy GVP, Guerrero A. Behavioral responses of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella to green leaf volatiles of Brassica oleracea subsp. capitata. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2000;48(12):6025-6029. Available:https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0008689

Dickens JC, Jang EB, Light DM, Alford AR. Enhancement of insect pheromone responses by green leaf volatiles. Naturwissenschaften. 1990;77:29-31.

Landolt PJ, Reed HC, Heath RR. Attraction of female papaya fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to male pheromone and host fruit. Environmental Entomology. 1992;21(5):1154-9.

Juan‐Blasco M, San Andrés V, Martínez‐Utrillas MA, Argilés R, Pla I, Urbaneja A, Sabater‐Muñoz B. Alternatives to ginger root oil aromatherapy for improved mating performance of sterile Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) males. Journal of Applied Entomology. 2013;137:244-51.

Shelly TE, Epsky ND. Exposure to tea tree oil enhances the mating success of male Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomologist. 2015; 98(4):1127-33.

Pope TW, Campbell CA, Hardie J, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ. Interactions between host-plant volatiles and the sex pheromones of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi and the damson-hop aphid, Phorodon humuli. Journal of chemical ecology. 2007;33:157-65.

Yu H, Zhang Y, Wyckhuys KA, Wu K, Gao X, Guo Y. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to caterpillar-induced volatiles from cotton. Environmental Entomology. 2010;39(2): 600-9.

Bruce TJ, Pickett JA. Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects–finding the right mix. Phytochemistry. 2011;72(13):1605-11.

Von Arx M, Schmidt-Büsser D, Guerin PM. Plant volatiles enhance behavioral responses of grapevine moth males, Lobesia botrana to sex pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2012;38: 222-225.

Schmidt-Büsser D, Von Arx M, Guerin PM. Host plant volatiles serve to increase the response of male European grape berry moths, Eupoecilia ambiguella, to their sex pheromone. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2009;195:853-64.

Vera MT, Ruiz MJ, Oviedo A, Abraham S, Mendoza M, Segura DF, Kouloussis NA, Willink E. Fruit compounds affect male sexual success in the South American fruit fly, Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Applied Entomology. 2013;137:2-10.

Lucas-Barbosa D. Integrating studies on plant–pollinator and plant–herbivore interactions. Trends in Plant Science. 2016;21(2):125-33.

Etl F, Berger A, Weber A, Schönenberger J, Dötterl S. Nocturnal plant bugs use cis-jasmone to locate inflorescences of an Araceae as feeding and mating site. Journal of chemical ecology. 2016;42:300-4.

Tengö J, Eriksson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Smith BH, Dobson H. Mate-locating strategies and multimodal communication in male mating behavior of Panurgus banksianus and P. calcaratus (Apoidea, Andrenidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 1988;388-95.

Turlings TC, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ. Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science. 1990;250(4985):1251-3.

Ruther J. Novel insights into pheromone‐mediated communication in parasitic hymenopterans. Chemical ecology of insect parasitoids. 2013;12-44.

Xu H, Veyrat N, Degen T, Turlings TC. Exceptional use of sex pheromones by parasitoids of the genus Cotesia: males are strongly attracted to virgin females, but are no longer attracted to or even repelled by mated females. Insects. 2014;5(3):499-512.

Fauvergue X, Hopper KR, Antolin MF. Mate finding via a trail sex pheromone by a parasitoid wasp. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1995;92 (3):900-4.

Godfray HC. Parasitoids: Behavioral and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press; 1994.

Stelinski LL, Liburd OE. Behavioral evidence for host fidelity among populations of the parasitic wasp, Diachasma alloeum (Muesebeck). Naturwissenschaften. 2005;92:65-8.

Dupuy F, Rouyar A, Deisig N, Bourgeois T, Limousin D, Wycke MA, Anton S, Renou M. A background of a volatile plant compound alters neural and behavioral responses to the sex pheromone blend in a moth. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017; 8:242909.

Tamaki Y, Noguchi H, Yushima T. Sex pheromone of Spodoptera litura (F.)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): isolation, identification, and synthesis. Applied entomology and zoology. 1973;8(3):200-3.

Yushima T, Tamaki Y, Kamano S, Oyama M. Field evaluation of a synthetic sex pheromone," litlure", as an attractant for males of Spodoptera litura (F.)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology. 1974;9(3):147-52.

Conner WF, Roach B, Benedict E, Meinwald J, Eisner T. Courtship pheromone production and body size as correlates of larval diet in males of the arctiid moth, Utetheisa ornatrix. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1990;16:543–52

Schneider D, Boppré M, Zweig J, Horsley SB, Bell TW, Meinwald J, Hansen K, Diehl EW. Scent organ development in Creatonotos moths: regulation by pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Science. 1982;215 (4537):1264-5.

Krasnoff SB, Dussourd DE. Dihydropyrrolixine attractants for arctiid moths that visit plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Journal of chemical ecology. 1989;15:47-60

Pliske TE. Courtship behavior and use of chemical communication by males of certain species of Ithomiine butterflies (Nymphalidae: Lepidoptera). Annals of Entomological Society of America. 1975; 68:935-942.

Dodson CH. Coevolution of orchids and bees. in coevolution of animals and plants. (LE Gilbert & PH Raven, eds). University of Texas, Austin Press. 1975;91-99.

Alcock J. Natural selection and communication among bark beetles. The Florida Entomologist. 1982;65(1):17-32.

Schmuff N, Phillips JK, Burkholder WE, Fales HM, Chen C, et al. The chemical identification of the rice and maize weevil pheromones. Tetrahedron Letter 1984;25: 1533–1534.

Mayhew TJ, Phillips TW. Pheromone biology of the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). In Stored Product Protection, ed. E Highley, EJ Wright, HJ Banks, BR Champ, Canberra: CABY. 1994;541–544.

Xu T, Hansen L, Teale SA. Mating and adult feeding behaviour influence pheromone production in female Asian longhorn beetle Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Agricultural and forest entomology. 2020;23(3):276-86.