STUDIES ON PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY OF HATTIKUNI RESERVOIR, YADGIR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA, INDIA

Main Article Content

L. SIDDARAM
B. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

Abstract

Productivity study is needed for the evaluation of the productivity of any aquatic ecosystems. The purpose of this study is to provide a baseline information regarding Hattikini Reservoir, Yadgir District, Karnataka, India for effective reservoir management. The study was carried out for a period of one year (February 2015 to January 2016) in each first week of the month using ‘light and dark bottle’ method. Results indicate that  High productivity of Hattikuni reservoir favors better growth of zooplanktons and higher organisms in the reservoir.

Keywords:
PP, GPP, NPP, CR, Hattikuni reservoir

Article Details

How to Cite
SIDDARAM, L., & REDDY, B. R. (2021). STUDIES ON PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY OF HATTIKUNI RESERVOIR, YADGIR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA, INDIA. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 42(7), 25-32. Retrieved from http://mbimph.com/index.php/UPJOZ/article/view/2040
Section
Original Research Article

References

Shwetanshumala BK, Sharma LL. Seasonal variation in primary productivity of Nandeshwar Dam of Udaipur district, Rajasthan, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoological Studies. 2019;7(3):1647- 1649.

Babar HT, Raje GB. Primary productivity study of Morawane dam in Ratnagiri district of Maharashtra, India. Journal of Global Bioscinces. 2015;4(2):1430-1438.

Adeniji HA, Ovie SI, Mdaihli M. An evaluation of the pelagic primary productivity and potential fish yield of Kainji Lake, Nigeria; 2001.

Rathod RP, ChaVan BR. Variation in primary production in relation to physico-chemical parameters of Kadwai Reservoir, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India. Current World Environment. 2016;11(1):228.

Anjinappa H. Hydrobiological studies and Avi-fauna at Bonal reservoir, Shorapur, Gulbarga district (Doctoral Dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis); 2002.

Fameeda S, Rajashekhar M, Parveen Z, Vijaykumar K. Primary productivity of Kumshi reservoir, Kalaburagi District, Karnataka. International Letters of Natural Sciences. 2015;44.

Patil A, Chavan N. Primary productivity studies in some freshwater reservoirs of Sangli District, Maharashtra. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 2010;9(1):101-103.

Vasanthkumar B, Vijaykumar K. Diurnal variation of physico chemical properties and primary productivity of phytoplankton in Bheema River. Recent Research in Science and Technology; 2011.

Sontakke GK, Mokashe SS. Seasonal variation in primary productivity of two freshwater lakes of Aurangabad district, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies. 2014;1(6):07-10.

Indur B, Reddy R, Vijaykumar K. Seasonal variation in primary productivity of freshwater reservoirs of Yadigir District, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology. 2016;1(2): 238505.

Parmar S, Sharma V. Seasonal variation in primary productivity of Som Kamla Amba reservoir of Dungarpur district, Rajasthan, India. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies. 5(3):105-107.

Hs PJ. Primary productivity and phytoplankton diversity in Pilikula Lake, Dakshina Kannada dist, Karnataka, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2019;7(2):133-139.

Garder T, Gran HH. Production of plankton in Oslo Fjord. Rap. Proc. Verb. Cons. Prem. Int. Explor. Mer. 1927;42:9-48.

Wetzel RD, Linkens GE. Limnological analysis. Edn 3, Springer, Newyork Xv. 2000;429.

Benton AH, Werner WE. Manual of field biology and ecology. Edn 5, Burgess Publishing Company, Minniapolis, Minnesota; 1972.

Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. Wetlands Edn 2, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Newyork, USA. 1993;722.

Prabhakar VM, Vaidya SP, Garud VS, Swain KK. Trend in primary production in Khdakwasla Reservoir. In 13th World Lake Conference, Wuhan, China; 2009.

Radwan AM. Some factors affecting the primary production of phytoplankton in Lake Burullus. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 2005;31(2):72-88.

Sheriff ZM, Ezz SM. Preliminary study of phytoplankton zooplankton relationship in Lake Burulus. Egypt Bull Inst Ocenogr Fish ARE. 1988;14(1):23-30.