COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION WITHIN COMPUTERIZED BONE MODEL

PDF

Published: 2021-12-31

DOI: 10.56557/upjoz/2021/v42i243273

Page: 1397-1406


SUBHA JOSHI *

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Karad, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences “Deemed to be University”, Karad, (Maharashtra)-415110, India.

SHIVSAGAR TEWARY

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Karad, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences “Deemed to be University”, Karad, (Maharashtra)-415110, India.

PRANOB SANYAL

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Karad, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences “Deemed to be University”, Karad, (Maharashtra)-415110, India.

AMIT BAJIRAO JADHAV

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Karad, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences “Deemed to be University”, Karad, (Maharashtra)-415110, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Dental implants' success is influenced by several variables, including internal fixation, bone density, design of the implant, prosthetics type, loading, oral microbiota, and parafunctional pressures. Several implant designs have been developed to increase primary implant stability, reduce the impact of shear stresses on the interface, and promote bone growth. The effects of four distinct implant collar designs on the two bone characteristics were examined in the current research. The entire osseointegration contact region in the cortical bone and the intricate three-dimensional trabecular bone contact pattern should also be included in the modelling of the bone-implant interface. The study was carried out to determine which implant collar design results in the least amount of crestal bone loss to provide the patient with long-lasting restoration by analysing the stress distribution within two distinct bone densities (D2, D3) using four distinct implant collar designs.

Keywords: Dental implants, bone model, stress distribution, collar design, bone loss


How to Cite

JOSHI, S., TEWARY, S., SANYAL, P., & JADHAV, A. B. (2021). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF STRESS DISTRIBUTION WITHIN COMPUTERIZED BONE MODEL. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 42(24), 1397–1406. https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2021/v42i243273

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aversa R, Petrescu FI, Petrescu RV, Apicella A. Biomimetic finite element analysis bone modeling for customized hybrid biological prostheses development. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2016;13(11):1060-7.

Ghadiri M, Shafiei N, Salekdeh SH, Mottaghi P, Mirzaie T. Investigation of the dental implant geometry effect on stress distribution at dental implant–bone interface. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2016;38(2):335-43.

Macedo JP, Pereira J, Faria J, Pereira CA, Alves JL, Henriques B, Souza JC, López-López J. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2017;71:441-7.

Pirmoradian M, Naeeni HA, Firouzbakht M, Toghraie D, Darabi R. Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch. Computer methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2020;187:105258.

Parashar SK, Sharma JK. A review on application of finite element modelling in bone biomechanics. Perspectives in Science. 2016;8:696-8.

Kim WH, Lee JC, Lim D, Heo YK, Song ES, Lim YJ, Kim B. Optimized dental implant fixture design for the desirable stress distribution in the surrounding bone region: a biomechanical analysis. Materials. 2019;12(17):2749.

Lee H, Park S, Noh G. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;121(4):659-70.

Lopez CA, Vasco MA, Ruales E, Bedoya KA, Benfatti CM, Bezzon OL, Deliberador TM. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in zirconia and titanium dental implants. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2018;44(6):409-15.

Guha I, Zhang X, Rajapakse CS, Chang G, Saha PK. Finite element analysis of trabecular bone microstructure using CT imaging and continuum mechanical modeling. Medical Physics; 2022.

Paul P, Mathur AK, Chitra P. Stress distribution patterns in mini-implant and bone in the infra-zygomatic crest region at different angulations: A finite element study. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2021;10(1):29-34.

Burton WS, Sintini I, Chavarria JM, Brownhill JR, Laz PJ. Assessment of scapular morphology and bone quality with statistical models. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. 2019;22(4):341-51.

Colman KL, De Boer HH, Dobbe JG, Liberton NP, Stull KE, Van Eijnatten M, Streekstra GJ, Oostra RJ, Van Rijn RR, Van der Merwe AE. Virtual forensic anthropology: the accuracy of osteometric analysis of 3D bone models derived from clinical computed tomography (CT) scans. Forensic science international. 2019;304:109963.