COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY OF ONE-STEP VERSUS TWO STEP PUTTY WASH IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES USING TWO DIFFERENT COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ADDITION SILICONE ELASTOMERIC IMPRESSION MATERIALS – AN In-vitro STUDY

PDF

Published: 2021-12-31

DOI: 10.56557/upjoz/2021/v42i243288

Page: 1458-1464


SUDHA B. MATTIGATTI *

Departmaent of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Karad (Dist. Satara), Maharashtra-415110, India.

ASHISH SUDHAKAR RATHOD

Departmaent of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Karad (Dist. Satara), Maharashtra-415110, India.

SULEKHA SIDDHARTH GOSAVI

Departmaent of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Karad (Dist. Satara), Maharashtra-415110, India.

SALEEM MAKANDAR

Departmaent of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Karad (Dist. Satara), Maharashtra-415110, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Introduction: An exact impression of dental and dentoalveolar structures is a significant and fundamental prerequisite for the exact fixture of the prosthesis. The advancement of the prosthesis with respect to fit, accuracy, and long life are dependent upon the impression materials, the strategies utilized, and the duration of time of pouring the impression.

Aim: Compare and Evaluate the Dimensional Accuracy of One-Step versus Two-Step Putty Wash Impression Techniques Using Two Different Commercially Available Addition Silicone Elastomeric Impression Materials.

Methodology: Impressions were made of a metal die having reference lines on it, by one-step wash impression technique and two-step impression technique. After making the impression, impression was allowed to set for 1 hour and then poured in Zhermack die stone. Die stone was allowed to set. Stone dies were obtained from each group. Metal die and stone dies from each group were assessed under stereo microscope 10x zoom using reference lines.

Results: When compared to a one-step putty wash impression approach, a two-step putty wash impression process was more reliable. Comparing Virtual (Ivoclar Vivadent, USA) addition polyvinyl siloxane impression material to Aquasil (Dentsply, Germany), it was discovered that it was more accurate. Based on the findings, it has been determined that Ivoclar Vivadent Virtual addition silicone is more precise than Zhermack Aquasil addition silicone and that two-step putty wash impression method is more accurate than one-step putty wash impression method.

Conclusion: Inside impediments of this study the following outcomes were drawn that two-stage clay wash impression method is more precise when contrasted with one stage clay wash impression strategy with a spacer of 1 mm for light body consistency expansion polyvinyl siloxane impression material. And The Ivoclar Vivadent Virtual expansion polyvinyl impression material showed more exactness when contrasted with Zhermack Aquasil expansion polyvinyl impression material utilizing one stage and two-stage clay wash impression strategies.

Keywords: Dimensional accuracy, two step putty wash, impression techniques, silicone elastomeric impression materials


How to Cite

MATTIGATTI, S. B., RATHOD, A. S., GOSAVI, S. S., & MAKANDAR, S. (2021). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY OF ONE-STEP VERSUS TWO STEP PUTTY WASH IMPRESSION TECHNIQUES USING TWO DIFFERENT COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE ADDITION SILICONE ELASTOMERIC IMPRESSION MATERIALS – AN In-vitro STUDY. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 42(24), 1458–1464. https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2021/v42i243288

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Suresh Sajjan. Matrix impression system (MIS) versus conventional putty reline technique (PRT): A comparative evaluation. J Indian Prostho Society. 2003;3:44-48.

Karl F Leinfelder, Jack E Lemons. Clinical restorative materials and techniques. chapter no. 7;359.

Rosenstiel. Contemporary fixe partial prosthodontics. 3rd edition. Mosby publication. 2002;431.

John F McCabe. Applied dental materials. 7th edition Blackwell scientific publication. 1992; 106(111);116-121.

Valderhang J, Odonts. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom made and stock trays. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52:514-517.

Kenneth J, Anusavice Phillips. Science of dental materials. 11th edition. Elsevier. 2004; 208:214-216.

Shillingberg: Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd edition, chapter no. 17, Impressions; 288.

Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000;83(2):161–165.

Ciesco JN, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;45(1):89-94.

Al-Bakri IA, Hussey D, Al-Omari WM. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials. J Clin Dent. 2007; 18(2):29-33.

Maho Shiozawa. Effects of the space for wash materials on sulcus depth reproduction with addition-curing silicone using two-step putty-wash technique, Dental Materials Journal. 2013;32(1):150–155.

Leão MP, Pinto CP, Sponchiado AP, Ornaghi BP. Dimensional stability of a novel polyvinyl siloxane impression technique. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2014;13:118-23.

Haim M, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H, Koch R, Walter MH, Quaas S. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2009;22(3).

Niranjan B, Shashikiran ND, Singla S, Thakur R, Dubey A, Maran S. A comparative microleakage evaluation of three different base materials in Class I cavity in deciduous molars in sandwich technique using dye penetration and dentin surface interface by scanning electron microscope. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2016;34(4):324.